Nutritional Labelling Testing India | FSSAI Compliant Analysis | NABL

Q: What is the penalty for mislabelled nutritional values under the FSS Act 2006?

Mislabelling of nutritional values is prosecuted under Section 53 of the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006 ("Penalty for misleading advertisement"), which provides for a fine that may extend to ten lakh rupees. Where the mislabelled value also renders the food sub-standard, misbranded, or unsafe, additional penalties under Sections 51 (sub-standard food), 52 (misbranded food), and 59 (unsafe food) may apply — these range from one lakh rupees to seven years imprisonment plus fines depending on severity and whether harm is caused. State Food Safety Officers can also issue improvement notices, marketplace delisting follows automatically on most platforms, and FSSAI may suspend or cancel the FBO licence. An NABL-accredited test report defending the declared value materially reduces enforcement risk.

Every packaged food product sold in India requires a compliant nutritional information panel — a single mislabelled value can trigger FSSAI enforcement action or marketplace delisting. Backed by the Arbro Group's analytical heritage — Arbro Lab since 1990, Auriga Research since 2007 — with NABL ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation, Auriga Research delivers FSSAI-compliant nutritional labelling testing with precision and speed.

Mandatory nutritional declaration on packaged food in India is governed by FSS (Packaging and Labelling) Regulations 2011 — Schedule II, with the format and display requirements expanded under the FSS (Labelling and Display) Regulations 2020. Both apply concurrently. Our nutritional testing covers proximate analysis (protein, fat, carbohydrates, moisture, ash), individual sugars, dietary fibre, trans fat and saturated fatty acid profiling by GC-FID, sodium by AAS/ICP-OES, and energy calculation. Extended panels cover vitamins (A, C, D, E, B-complex), minerals (calcium, iron, zinc, potassium), and confirmed capabilities in amino acid and nucleotide profiling for infant formula, sports nutrition, and health drink categories.

FSSAI front-of-pack labelling requirements (red/amber/green indicators for sugar, salt, and saturated fat) are being phased in, making accurate analytical data even more critical for product formulation and labelling decisions.

Testing Parameters

Each parameter is mapped to its validated method or pharmacopoeial reference so QA and labelling teams can match scope to declaration at a glance.

Kjeldahl

Protein

Kjeldahl method per AOAC 928.08 — total nitrogen converted to protein with the appropriate factor (×6.25 default).

Soxhlet

Total Fat

Soxhlet extraction with solvent — gravimetric quantification of total fat content.

GC-FID

Saturated & Trans Fat

Fatty acid profile by GC-FID per AOAC 996.06 — required for FSSAI trans fat declaration and the 2% w/w industrial trans fat cap.

By Difference

Total Carbohydrates

Calculated by difference: 100 − (protein + fat + moisture + ash + fibre) — FSSAI-accepted method for the nutrition information panel.

HPLC

Added & Total Sugars

Individual sugars (glucose, fructose, sucrose, lactose, maltose) by HPLC — required for front-of-pack labelling and "added sugars" disclosure.

AOAC 991.43

Dietary Fibre

Total dietary fibre by the enzymatic-gravimetric method (AOAC 991.43) — supports FSSAI labelling and "source of fibre" / "high in fibre" claims.

AAS / ICP-OES

Sodium

Sodium quantification by atomic absorption or ICP-OES — required for the FOP salt indicator.

Energy

Energy (kcal & kJ)

Energy calculation in kcal and kJ from macronutrient composition using FSSAI Atwater factor conventions.

Vitamins

Vitamins (A · C · D · E · B-complex)

Vitamins A, C, D, E, B1, B2, B3, B6, B12, and folic acid by HPLC and microbiological assay.

Minerals

Minerals (Ca · Fe · Zn · K · P)

Calcium, iron, zinc, potassium, and phosphorus by ICP-OES or AAS for products making mineral nutrient claims.

Cholesterol

Cholesterol content by GC-FID — required for labels making cholesterol claims (cholesterol-free, low-cholesterol).

Amino Acids

20 free and protein-bound amino acids by HPLC post-column ninhydrin and LC-MS/MS — available for infant formula, sports nutrition, and health drink products.

Nucleotides

5′-CMP, 5′-UMP, 5′-AMP, 5′-GMP, 5′-IMP by HPLC — available for infant formula, sports nutrition, and health drink products.

How It Works

Get a Quote

Share your product type and the parameters you need tested. Your dedicated SPOC will confirm the testing scope, the applicable method, and the exact sample quantity required for your specific panel before you dispatch anything.

Send Your Sample

Dispatch your sample with a completed Test Request Form to the nearest Auriga lab. Each sample is individually bar coded and registered in YLIMS, Auriga's in-house Laboratory Information Management System, upon receipt. Testing begins within 24 hours of sample registration.

Testing and QA Review

Your sample is tested against the confirmed validated method by Auriga's scientific team. Every result passes through a formal internal QA review and sign-off before the report is generated.

Receive Your NABL Report

Your NABL-accredited test report is delivered digitally within the committed turnaround time. Reports carry Auriga's NABL accreditation under ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and are accepted by FSSAI, APEDA, EIC, and major international buyers. You can track your sample status in real time through YLIMS at any point in the process.

Turnaround Time

Panel	Standard TAT	Express
Proximate analysis only (protein, fat, carbs, moisture, ash)	5–7 business days	Available
Standard nutritional labelling panel (proximate + sugars + fibre + sodium + fatty acids)	10–12 business days	Available
Extended panel with vitamins and minerals	12–15 business days	On request
Amino acid / nucleotide profiling add-on	+ 5–7 business days	—
Trans fat / saturated fat by GC-FID (standalone)	7–10 business days	Available

Who Needs This Testing

Packaged food manufacturers needing the mandatory nutritional information panel for FSSAI licence applications and renewals.
D2C food and beverage brands launching new SKUs on Amazon, Flipkart, Blinkit, Zepto, BigBasket — all platforms now require an analyst-verified nutrition panel before listing.
Importers required to relabel packaged imports in INR-priced packs with India-compliant nutrition panels per FSS Regulations 2011.
Infant formula, sports nutrition, and health drink brands needing amino acid and nucleotide profiling alongside the standard panel.
Reformulators verifying that a recipe change still meets label claims (sugar-free, high-protein, low-fat, source of fibre, etc.).
Brand owners contesting a marketplace delisting or an FSSAI surveillance finding with an NABL-accredited counter-report.

Why Auriga for Nutritional Labelling

Arbro Group analytical heritage

Established analytical heritage through the Arbro Group (Arbro Lab since 1990, Auriga Research since 2007), with NABL ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation — the audit trail that FSSAI, marketplaces, and procurement teams look for.

Dual NABL + FSSAI notification

Reports carry evidentiary weight under the FSS Act 2006 for licence applications, surveillance responses, and marketplace listing reviews.

Label-ready output, not raw data

CoAs include per-100 g and per-serving values formatted for direct paste into your nutrition information panel — no separate formatting step on your side.

Full extended panel under one roof

Proximate, sugars, fibre, fatty acids by GC-FID, vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and nucleotides — no partner-lab dependency, no sample-splitting delays.

Five regional labs

Delhi, Gurugram, Bangalore, Baddi, and Bahadurgarh — closer to your factory or warehouse means lower sample-courier risk and faster despatch.

Express service

Time-critical panels (proximate, fatty acid screen) available on express turnaround for marketplace launches and FSSAI surveillance deadlines.

Related Services

Frequently Asked Questions

What parameters are required for FSSAI nutritional labelling?

FSSAI mandates declaration of energy (kcal), total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, cholesterol, total carbohydrates, added sugars, protein, and sodium per 100g/100ml and per serving. Additionally, any nutrient or health claim on the label must be substantiated with analytical data. Vitamins and minerals claimed on the label must be verified to contain at least 80% of the declared value.

What is the difference between proximate analysis and full nutritional profiling?

Proximate analysis covers the core macronutrients: moisture, protein (Kjeldahl), fat (Soxhlet), ash, crude fibre, and carbohydrates by difference. Full nutritional profiling additionally includes individual sugars, dietary fibre (enzymatic-gravimetric), saturated and trans fatty acids by GC-FID, sodium, and energy calculation. FSSAI labelling requires full profiling for packaged foods.

How long does nutritional labelling analysis take?

Standard nutritional labelling panels take 10-12 business days. Proximate analysis alone takes 5-7 business days. Extended panels including vitamins and minerals take 12-15 business days. Fatty acid profiling by GC-FID takes 7-10 business days.

What is the FSSAI tolerance on declared nutritional values?

FSSAI allows a tolerance of ±20% on most declared nutrient values on the nutrition information panel — i.e., the analytically measured value should fall within ±20% of what is declared on the label for macronutrients (protein, fat, carbohydrates), energy, and dietary fibre. Stricter tolerances apply to specific claims: nutrients claimed on the label as added (e.g., "high in vitamin D") must be present at not less than 80% of the declared value, while nutrients restricted by claim (e.g., "low sodium") must not exceed the declared value. Front-of-pack labelling thresholds for sugar, salt, and saturated fat have their own absolute limits independent of the ±20% tolerance. When designing a label, build a small headroom into declared values so routine batch variation stays comfortably inside the tolerance.

What sample quantity is required for nutritional labelling analysis?

Sample quantity depends on the product category, product format, and the parameters selected for testing (basic nutritional information panel vs extended panel with amino acids, nucleotides, or a full vitamin and mineral profile). Send the finished packaged product in its sealed original retail pack wherever possible — sealed retail packaging preserves the moisture, oxidative state, and fat distribution of the product as it reaches consumers, while sampling from bulk or open containers can shift moisture, free fatty acid, and trans fat readings. Our team will recommend the appropriate quantity after reviewing your testing requirement.

What is the penalty for mislabelled nutritional values under the FSS Act 2006?

Mislabelling of nutritional values is prosecuted under Section 53 of the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006 ("Penalty for misleading advertisement"), which provides for a fine that may extend to ten lakh rupees. Where the mislabelled value also renders the food sub-standard, misbranded, or unsafe, additional penalties under Sections 51 (sub-standard food), 52 (misbranded food), and 59 (unsafe food) may apply — these range from one lakh rupees to seven years imprisonment plus fines depending on severity and whether harm is caused. State Food Safety Officers can also issue improvement notices, marketplace delisting follows automatically on most platforms, and FSSAI may suspend or cancel the FBO licence. An NABL-accredited test report defending the declared value materially reduces enforcement risk.

How long is a nutritional labelling report valid for FSSAI compliance?

A nutritional labelling test report does not have a statutory expiry date under the FSS Act — once issued, it remains valid for the specific batch/lot tested. However, FSSAI guidance and good labelling practice recommend re-verifying the declared values whenever any of the following changes: (a) the formulation or recipe; (b) the raw material supplier (particularly for vitamin / mineral premixes); (c) the manufacturing site or process; (d) the packaging material (which can affect moisture and oxidative parameters); (e) the shelf life or storage conditions. As a practical default, we recommend full nutritional retesting once every 12 months for stable products and immediately after any of the changes listed above. For products making vitamin or claim-bearing label statements, more frequent verification may be needed to stay inside the ±20% tolerance.

Get a Tailored Recommendation

Talk to a Testing Expert